Peacemongers
I am
always amazed by how quickly peace becomes popular when there is the
threat of an armed conflict somewhere in the world. Now I'm not talking
about the desire for a nonviolent solution... I think that's usually
the way to go. I'm talking about this embittered, poisonous xenophobia
that sweeps across my great nation of America whenever there is something
that is not right in the world that a president or body of elected officials
deigns to do something about.
I will
be the first to admit that I am not up to date on current events around
the world. I do not spend hours on end sniffing around the newsnets,
on the web, the newspaper, or watching CNN to get every single fact
possible about an event. Sometimes the minor details are unimportant.
Recently,
the eyes of the entire world have been on the recent conflicts in Afghanistan
and Iraq. In both instances, powerful, terrible regimes have been demolished
we are trying to install close approximations of democracy. I am something
of a simpleton with respect to things like these, for I believe that
these kinds of things are good. I believe that it's a good
thing for people to have free speech. I believe it's a good thing
for people to live relatively free of fear. I believe it's a good
thing to have a government by the people. I want these things for myself,
and I sure as heck want them for others. Wow. I can't believe I just
said that. I'm going against the grain because, apparently, that's a
very unpopular viewpoint.
Peace, like I said,
is a good thing. How you get it is the tricky part. Many people who are
opposed to war point to a peaceful resistance. What most people don't
understand is that without costing a great number of lives, a peaceful
resistance only has a chance of succeeding against an oppressor with a
free press. Ghandi led his revolt against the British and succeeded. Most
oppressors are not like the British, however. Think about what would have
happened if the Jews staged a peaceful resistance against the Nazis.
But
the problem with a lot of peacemongers out there is not that they want
peace, or how they think we can get it, but it's why they want
peace. These peacemongers I'm referring to, are those who think we have
no business meddling in the affairs of others and should go about our
own business and solve our own problems. And they have a point. We do, indeed, have our own substantial problems. There
are jobless, hungry, and homeless people in the USA and we should be
taking care of those people and issues. They say that even if we were
able to handle our own problems and take a hand in world events, giving
even more people the most basic of human rights at the same time, it doesn't
mean we should.
And
besides, they say, our government doesn't actually do anything to be
benevolent, it only does what is in it's own best interests. The only
reason we went into Afghanistan was to get bin Laden. The only reason
we invaded Iraq is to get the oil.
I think
that's true to a certain extent... but my answer to that line of argument
is, "So what?" In Afghanistan, we rooted out the big
terrorist networks and toppled a iron-handed regime. In Iraq, maybe
we have control over the oil for the time being, but a cruel and malevolent
ruler has been deposed and the most destabilizing force in the entire
region has been eliminated. Their answer: "But who are we to
be the world's police force?!?"
At
its core, the issue of interposing assistance is an ethical one, not
one of self-motivated personal interest and the question of "Whose
business is it of ours?" says more about the person asking
the question than any satisfying answer could.
For
example, if I were to ask these people if they had ever donated money
to a church or any charitable cause, they would probably answer "yes".
Some people might support Amnesty International, "Save the Whales",
or even volunteer at a local soup kitchen two or three times a year.
These same people who feel the need to pass on a five dollar bill to
the bum on the street corner or give aid to an anonymous hungry child
in Africa, feel complete indifference to letting millions of people
starve under the boot of a malicious dictator who uses horribly lethal
chemical weapons on his own people, or a government that creates such
a catastrophe of women's human rights violations that self-immolation
is a common form of suicide.
Only
someone who is completely soulless, so devoid of compassion and conscience
can make the argument of "Whose business is it of ours?"
valid. Anyone who has read a news story, or seen the effects of the
terrible conditions people live under day after day has felt at least
something. They feel the twinge of sympathy and shame. Because
we can make a difference in the world. We can make a positive change.
We can save lives and improve human rights conditions. An individual
citizen can't do much, but a nation can.
Everyone
needs to get over this idea that if they don't see it in front of them,
it doesn't really happen. We see homeless people on the streets. We
see the starving children in Africa on television. So, we donate money
to these causes; after all, we give a buck, we solve a problem, we feel
good. There's nothing worth risking lives there. But I guarantee, if
movies like Osama
were more widely viewed, people would be clamoring to invade these poor
countries and free the multitudes from oppression.
I
believe that if
someone has the power to do something, to make something
right, or to assist someone in a
way that only that one person can, then they have a duty to try
and make it happen. We
are the world's police force because no
one
else can
do it. The US and a few other nations are, whether we like it or not,
now responsible for the welfare of the rest of the world. We crossed
the finish line first, now we have to go back and look for the stragglers
lost along the way.
Some
say that we have had too many of these conflicts. The US has helped
enough people, let some other nations pick up the slack. But if it were
up to me, we would go nation-to-nation, door-to-door, and clean up house.
No one deserves to live a life in the shadow of terror, fear, and death.
Back